Cheat Sheet on the Future of Cars & Energy…


I am inspired by GM’s bold push into the all electric motor age of vehicle design… I have been watching their reinvention of vehicle design and manufacturing since their ‘Autonomy’ concept car…
See recent images of Volt’s new fuel cell/battery chassis - via CNET

Continue below to check out my cheat sheet… it is my attempt to help evolve the conversation around transportation and energy beyond talk of hybrids, ethanol - and the confusion over ‘electric or hydrogen’ vehicles (when they are the really same thing!)

Q: What powers the 21st vehicle?

A: Electrons feeding electric motors!
The future ‘fuel’ for vehicles isn’t a fuel at all – it is an ‘energy carrier’.

 

Q: How will we supply the electrons?

A: A combination of batteries, hydrogen fuel cell and capacitors.  Not one system is likely to dominate in the end.

Cars are not iPods and battery performance is not suited for vehicle systems.  While we are certain to see all battery electric vehicles in the marketplace, at some point, fuel cells will become competitive and offer superior cost/performance  to batteries.   Expect auto engineers to utilize all three systems - fuel cells for main power supply, batteries for systems control, and capacitors for extra propulsion.

 

Q: Where will we get the electrons and hydrogen from?

A: All sources of energy – hydrocarbons, nuclear and renewables (including next generation biofuels).
In a system based on electric motors (not liquid fuels for combustion) renewables can finally compete.  Remember that in a combustion engine platform you cannot put wind/solar energy into the tank. 

 

Q: What will disappear first – oil or the combustion engine?

A: The Combustion Engine. Oil has a lot of life left. And natural gas is likely to be the main feedstock for H2!

 

Q: What about hybrids & ethanol?

A: They only extend the era of the combustion engine. They are not ‘disruptive technologies’- and looking at total global consumption of oil and combustion engine vehicles - these options cannot improve the situation for the planet or the automobile industry. The combustion engine is huge liability for automakers given its complexities of supply chains (for mechanical power systems/transmission) and design limitations (remember, 1/3rd of vehicle bodies are taken up to house the engine).  The most disruptive system would be four wheel based electric motors that allow automakers to construct multiple body chassis on the same factory floor. 

 

Q: When will fuel cells become cost effective?

A: We don’t know - but soon! Nearly 75% of fuel cell costs relate to its membrane (MEA). For PEM Fuel cells this has meant fluorocarbon based membranes (i.e. Nafion). Lower cost alternatives include hydrocarbon membranes and the use of nanoparticles to reduce amount needed for precious metals. Also watch out for ‘ink jet’ printing of MEAs… So be patient. And confident that electrochemical conversion will be much cheaper than mechanical combustion engines soon enough…! Learn about membrane science at the nanoscale.

 

Q: Won’t the hydrogen tanks blow up?

A: Hydrogen will be stored as solid - not a liquid or gas. Imagine sponges with high surface areas that bind hydrogen molecules.

Q: What about converting gas stations? Or building the ‘Hydrogen Highway’?

A: We might see some corner hydrogen gas stations. But the solid state storage of hydrogen allows for retail based distribution. So you can purchase fuel for your car (in the form of bricks) at your local retail store. The other favored option is home-based hydrogen production using natural gas lines and energy appliances; or solar panel/electrical grid electrolysis machines. We cannot pick winners. But don’t expect to see corner hydrogen ’stations’!

 

Q: Why will the electric vehicle dominate life in the 21st Century?

A: Because it creates more social and economic value for industries and consumers. Electric propulsion systems promise much leaner manufacturing/supply chains; and provide a clear path for future revenue growth around telematics (in car services based on electricity) Look for more posts about the potential 2nd and 3rd level implications of electric vehicle ownership in our cities and rural communities.


Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

If you convert natural gas to hydrogen for fuel cells, or use methane as the feed stock for fuel cells, won’t you still produce CO2?

Sorry, you are a few innovations short of the technology revolution: Fusion power (Not the stupid Tolomak being built in Cadarache, but the tiny container-sized reactors developed from George Bussard’s plans.) will dominate the future.

No need to crack hydrogen from natural gas (Not very environmentally friendly) when you have power-for-africa to crack it straight from water, locally.

This prevents the intractable of transporting H - which is problematic at best and downright dangerous at worst (”Explodes with a squeky pop”, i.e. Hindenburg 101) and so the future of the world looks very different to today: instead of centralsied power generation and massive losses in transmission, power is generated almost at a neighbourhood level.

Solid H is nothing but a dream, and will be completely unnecessary in the localised economies of the mid and late 21st century.

Also, the combustion engine will be with for a very long time to come. I predict that petrol motors will still be produced as late as 2050 - and they’ll be in cars, too. There is just too much infrastructure in place for it to simply disappear. I think it will take around 50 years of Fusion before the internal combustion engine makes a graceful exit.

Will -
Yes, when you reform natural gas for H2 you do have CO2. (Though much less than through combustion.) As long as we are dealing hydrocarbon inputs then I am comfortable with the CO2 byproduct- and believe we’ll have a way to neutralize it sooner or later. Yes, the most ideal system is solar-electron solar-H2 but I am looking for a compromise to ‘greening’ fossil fuels and put my bet on electrochemical / biological conversion over combustion. Thanks for the comment..!

Mobius -
Yes, I’m certain there are great innovations ahead not listed in my piece. I think our timelines might be different - I am looking 5-10 years out. I wasn’t aiming for a tech revolution- just an evolution of electricity.

And yes, electrolysis is a cleaner method if the inputs are clean - so I am with you!

Disagree on your skepticism of H2 storage/transportation. And I’m sure with your energy knowledge you know the truth with the Hindenberg. All the gas left within seconds and the fire was from the coating on the material. It wasn’t a H2 gas explosion. H2 is a light gas that is not explosive unless contained. Gasoline is more dangerous as a liquid than H2 as a gas. Even so- my strategy is H2 as a solid.

H2 stored as a solid is actually very realistic. Look at metal hydrides in short term with physical adsorption in MOF-like materials for long term. (A liquid solution could emerge…but I think solid state is most compatible with local production- and will be less energy intensive.)

I disagree that it is ‘a dream’- and of the H2 ‘transport’ problem. I’ve heard the argument before and think it falls short. It was a relevant argumentin 1999 but won’t stand up against technologies of 2009. The arguments are dated and do not speak of major advances in materials science over the past few years.

We are doing quite well in understanding solid state storage systems. But if you have research evidence that suggests otherwise please let me know!

Solid blocks can be transported on trains, boat or vehicles. And they make a great ‘add on’ to the existing electrical grid. Solid blocks could capture energy from remote wind/solar farms without the cost of connecting to lines.

And yes the combustion engine will be around for a long time. Agreed. But will it be the ‘growth platform’ for the autoindustry? Probably not. LPs and CDs are still around the music industry, but they are not the growth platform. Growth is the key. And electric motors are too appealing from a manufacturing/design standpoint.

I cannot see any player in the auto industry being able to compete after the all electric vehicle platform matures. The money is not in making cars - but selling telematic services- and aftermarket customization.

Alright - good comments, good stuff.
And thanks for the Bussard link– I’m reading up now!
Thanks– Garry